Cancer treatment does not end fertility in young women, according to the findings of a study that was presented at 36th Annual Meeting of ESHRE.
In this study, researchers assessed data on 879 young female patients who were treated for a range of cancers between 2000 and 2019; all had sought counselling on preserving their fertility ahead of treatment. The mean age of the patients was 33 years old, and breast cancer was the most frequent diagnosis (63% of cases). Subsequent to counseling, 373 patients (42%) chose to have their fertility preserved by one of three methods available: egg freezing (53%); embryo freezing (41%); both methods together (5%); and ovarian tissue cryopreservation (1%)
According to the results, the rate of those returning to make use of their frozen eggs and embryos is 16% (61/373), and 44 of them achieved a remarkably high birth rate of 71%, with a twin rate of 9%, when the fertilized eggs and embryos were transferred in an IVF procedure. Around two-thirds of patients returned within two years of their diagnosis; women with breast cancer were the most likely to return for fertility treatment. These patients also achieved the highest birth rates, significantly higher, for example, than those with lymphoma (70% vs 30%).
“The results are a demonstration of how fertility preservation in these cases can be effective,” says Dr Dalia Khalife from Guy’s and St Thomas’s Hospital, London in a press release. “Around one in six of those who stored their gametes had a good outcome.”
While the cancer treatment had variable effects on fertility, “almost all patients” did show some deterioration in their ovarian reserve levels, reflecting a range of responses from mild toxicity of treatment (minimal effect on ovarian reserve markers) to severe toxicity (premature ovarian insufficiency). There were even a number of naturally conceived pregnancies after cancer treatment.
Dr Khalife explains that the most appropriate method of fertility preservation is decided on an individual basis. “Oocyte freezing is usually offered to young women,” she says, “and, with our vastly improved freezing techniques, provides a good chance of future pregnancy. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation, though still not widely available, is undertaken in selected cases where time is urgent. This technique also now provides an option for the prepubertal female, where previously none existed.”
This study showed a patient follow-up rate of 16% to make use of their frozen eggs and embryos, but this rate, says Dr Khalife, “will definitely increase” in time. “When fertility preservation is carried out in young women – in their teens and twenties,” she explains, “they are unlikely to return for many years. Previously, there were few options for fertility in these young women – but now there is and our data show that the results can be of great benefit.”
Cancer treatment in young women need not mean the end of their fertilityhttps://t.co/iocC8agD0l
— K Pavithran (@drkpavithran) July 6, 2020
News: Cancer treatment in young women need not mean the end of their fertility – https://t.co/tQr0z3cA7t
— 7thSpace Interactive (@7thSpaceCom) July 6, 2020