Bleeding and New Cancer Diagnosis in Patients with Atherosclerosis

Background:

Patients treated with antithrombotic drugs are at risk of bleeding. Bleeding may be the first manifestation of underlying cancer.

Methods:

We examined new cancers diagnosed in relation to gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding among patients enrolled in the Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies (COMPASS) trial, and determined the hazard of newcancer diagnosis after bleeding at these sites.

Results:

Of 27,395 patients enrolled (mean age 68, women 21%), 2,678 (9.8%) experienced any (major or minor) bleeding, 713 (2.6%) experienced major bleeding, and 1,084 (4.0%) were diagnosed with cancer, during a mean follow-up of 23 months. Among 2,678 who experienced bleeding, 257 (9.9%) were subsequently diagnosed with cancer. Gastrointestinal bleeding was associated with a 20-fold higher hazard of new gastrointestinal cancer diagnosis (7.4% versus 0.5%, hazard ratio [HR] 20.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.2-27.8), and 1.7-fold higher hazard of new non-gastrointestinal cancer diagnosis(3.8% versus 3.1%, HR 1.70, 95% CI: 1.20-2.40). Genitourinary bleeding was associated with a 32-fold higher hazard of newgenitourinary cancer diagnosis (15.8% versus 0.8%, HR 32.5, 95% CI: 24.7-42.9) and urinary bleeding was associated with a 98-fold higher hazard of new urinary cancer diagnosis (14.2% versus 0.2%, HR 98.5, 95% CI: 68.0-142.7). Non-gastrointestinal, non-genitourinary bleeding was associated with a 3-fold higher hazard of non-gastrointestinal, non-genitourinary cancers (4.4% versus 1.9%, HR 3.02, 95% CI: 2.32-3.91).

Conclusions:

In patients with atherosclerosis treated with antithrombotic drugs, any gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding was associated with higher rates of new cancer diagnosis. Any gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding should prompt investigation for cancers at these sites.